Warning: Spoilers Ahead!Many movies deliberately leave their mysteries unanswered, but some would have been better served untangling the mystery and providing closure. Whether it’s the contents of the briefcase inPulp Fictionor the identity of Sophie’s real father inMamma Mia!,some movie mysteries are better left unsolved. However, a lot of the time,an unsolved movie mystery is not worth the ambiguity that it causes, whether that’s a result of it leaving a major plot hole unanswered, causing frustration among audiences, or hindering the narrative of the movie itself.
From the identity of a masked vigilante to the fate of an iconic supervillain,these movie mysteries often feel like a lack of closure rather than compelling storytelling. Some of them may well be answered in future movies, while some are likely to remain unsolved indefinitely. What is for certain is that all of them would make their movies better if they were explained, whether that’s partially or fully.
The Ballad of Buster Scruggs: All 6 Endings Explained
Joel & Ethan Coen’s surreal Western anthology Netflix tells multiple stories. Here’s The Ballad of Buster Scruggs endings (all 6) explained.
10Is Deckard A Replicant In Blade Runner?
A Misguided Metaphor For Humanity
The ambiguity around Rick Deckard’s (Harrison Ford) true identity inBlade Runnerhas often been touted as a profound piece of symbolism that provokes discussion about the nature of humanity. WhileBlade Runneris undoubtedly a masterclass in how to explore the human condition, creating a sense of confusion about the main protagonist often feels like an unfinished thought that the filmmakers themselves couldn’t resolve.Ford and the movie’s director, Ridley Scott, have oftendisagreed about what Deckard’s true potential replicant nature inBlade Runneris.
“By not answering the question of Deckard’s nature, the filmmakers may have unintentionally damaged the message of human love that made the first movie so fantastic.”
Leaving the mystery unsolved in the 1982 original may have worked well on its own, but the lack of any clarification in Denis Villeneuve’s 2017Blade Runner: 2049, perpetuates this frustration. In an interview, Villeneuve himself stated rather paradoxically that while he “loves” the mystery of Deckard’s identity, he also views the originalBlade Runneras a movie about “a human falling in love with a designed being” (viaCinemaBlend). By not answering the question of Deckard’s nature, the filmmakers havedamaged the message of human love that made the first movie so endearing.
9Who is ‘V’ In V For Vendetta?
Is Anonymity Really A Compelling Symbol Of Rebellion?
V For Vendettais one of the most unique moviesof modern times, centering on the story of an anonymous anarchist simply known as V (Hugo Weaving) as he engages in acts of terrorism against a totalitarian regime in a dystopian UK. Now, it is undeniably intriguing to watch V ignite rebellion without ever revealing his identity, but it is hard not to feel thatV For Vendettamissed a major opportunity by keeping him anonymous.There is a lack of resolution within the narrative, and it stems from V’s anonymity.
By not exploring V’s backstory or specific motives,V For Vendettasacrifices its emotional depth.V’s anonymity is a double-edged sword, catalyzing the message of the movie while also distancing audiences from gaining a true understanding of what the rebel is fighting for. Abstraction always works in movies to a certain extent, but in the case of V’s identity inV For Vendetta, it has been taken too far. This lack of clarity is ultimately ironic considering V’s thoughts about knowledge: “Knowledge is like air, vital to live. Like air, no one should be denied it.”
8How Much Was Truthful In The Usual Suspects?
Masterful Writing Or Convenient Excuse?
The plot twist at the end ofThe Usual Suspectsis one of the greatest in movie history, revealing that Roger “Verbal” Kint (Kevin Spacey) was in fact the criminal mastermind Keyser Söze.Agent Dave Kujan (Chazz Palminteri) realizes that Verbal has fabricated his story using information and news clippings from around his office during the interrogation.Despite this, the twist never truly reveals what parts of Verbal’s story were real, and what were fictitious.
Evidently, there had to be some truth to the story because of the massacre on the boat, otherwise Verbal/Söze had no reason to be in the interrogation room in the first place, but the extent of this truth is never revealed. The ambiguity of Verbal’s story may keep audiences intrigued inThe Usual Suspectslong after the credits roll, yet it feels likean excuse to avoid tying up the loose endsof the movie’s convoluted plot. While it is a movie mystery handled with the utmost care, it risks undermining the intricacies of Verbal’s web of lies that drive the plot ofThe Usual Suspects.
7What Is The Narrator’s Name In Fight Club?
A Gimmick Rather Than A Plot Device
Fight Clubis well known for its story that tackles the crisis of toxic masculinity and identity, and the anonymity of The Narrator (Edward Norton) supports this message very effectively. In a movie that is full of psychological manipulation and twists, not even revealing The Narrator’s name just adds an unnecessary layer of ambiguity. Not only does this risk the audience not connecting with the character,but it may even undermine how many viewers interpret the film.
“In a movie that is full of psychological manipulation and twists, not even revealing The Narrator’s name just adds an unnecessary layer of ambiguity”
By not giving The Narrator a name,Fight Clubneedlessly confuses viewers from the outset.This confusion is only heightened whenFight Club’s main twist of the movie reveals Tyler Durden(Brad Pitt) to be an alter of The Narrator. Yes, it adds to The Narrator’s struggles with self-definition, but it is also a highly convoluted plot point that serves more as a gimmick in the shadow ofFight Club’s mystery than a meaningful device to intrigue audiences.
6What Caused The Groundhog Day Time Loop?
A Missed Opportunity
Groundhog Dayis one of the most influential comedy movies of all time, telling the story of cynical weather forecaster Phil Connors (Bill Murray) as he finds himself constantly reliving the same day. While the audience can assume that Phil was trapped in the time loop as a way to learn a metaphorical lesson about humanity, it is never revealed what actually causes it.There have been numerous theories about its true cause, including one that posits theGroundhog Dayloop was the work of the Devil.
This seems to bea major mistake on the filmmaker’s part. If the movie had revealed the true cause of the time loop, this could have elevated the movie’s symbolism greatly.Groundhog Day’s writer, Danny Rubin, “never intended” to make a movie with a truly deep meaning, and as a result, the cause of the time loop will likely never be revealed, much to the frustration of audiences around the world (viaThe Telegraph).
5What Was Joker’s Fate After The Dark Knight?
Not Mentioned In The Dark Knight Rises
Heath Ledger’s Joker inThe Dark Knightis arguably the best comic book movie villain of all time. The chaos and life that Ledger brought to the role was incredible, earning him a posthumous Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor. While it was out of the utmost respect for Ledger following his tragic passing that meant the Joker did not appear inThe Dark Knight Rises,the movie does not even mention the character.
A performance as legendary as Ledger’ssurely deserved at least a mention in the sequel, especially considering the Joker’s monumental impact onThe Dark Knight’s story and Bruce Wayne’s (Christian Bale) psyche. Failing to mention the Joker at all means that the fate of the character himself remains uncertain, as he was left dangling from a buildingat the end ofThe Dark Knight. It also means that his story did not get the closure some audiences would have been eager to see following the death of the acting legend.
4Who Bought Avengers Tower?
The MCU Still Hasn’t Addressed It
InSpider-Man: Homecoming, released in 2017, it was revealed that Tony Stark (Robert Downey Jr.) had sold the iconic Avengers Tower in New York City to move the superheroes upstate to their compound. The sale of the tower has been addressed a few times, but besides that, this has not been explored at all. As there are more than a few billionaires who exist in Marvel Comics and could have bought the tower, this lack of resolution seems to bedrawn out for an unnecessarily long period of time.
The sale of Avengers Tower now seems more like it has been forgotten by the MCU, rather than being used as a genuine plot point. While it certainly keeps audiences intrigued in the franchise, it is just one example of the lack of cohesiveness and logic seen in the more recent MCU installments.Alongside themassive Celestial emerging from the ocean fromEternals, the new ownership of Avengers Tower feels like it should have had more of an impact on the overarching story of the MCU by now.
3Does Ray Die At The End Of In Bruges?
Emotion Is Outweighed By Ambiguity
In Brugestells the story of hitmen Ray (Colin Farrell) and Ken (Brendan Gleeson) as they flee to Bruges following a botched job where a child was accidentally killed by the former. Ray’s guilt is one of the primary facets of the story, driving him to attempt suicide before being stopped by Ken.In Brugesends with Ray suffering multiple gunshot woundsat the hands of his cruel boss,Harry (Ralph Fiennes), and praying in an ambulance: “I really, really hoped I wouldn’t die.”
The thing is, it is never revealed if Ray has died or not. The ambiguity is initially appealing before one realizes that the entirety ofIn Brugeshas been building towards Ray’s ultimate fate. If he does die, it is a tragedy considering he has just clawed his way back from suicide. If he survives, it could be a happy ending. By not giving the viewers a definite answer,In Brugesends up catering to the worst of both worlds- Ray’s fate is uncertain, meaning his character arc has been left indefinitely unfinished.
2What Is The Veil In Harry Potter?
And What Does It Mean?
The 2007 movie adaptation ofHarry Potter and the Order of the Phoenixintroduces audiences to The Veil, a mysterious stone archway hidden deep in The Ministry of Magic’s Department of Mysteries. During a fight with a group of Death Eaters, Harry’s godfather, Sirius Black (Gary Oldman) is killed by Bellatrix Lestrange (Helena Bonham Carter) and passes through The Veil.The true origins and purpose are never revealed in the movies, with the books also providing very few answers.
“This was a missed opportunity by both the author and the filmmakers to delve deeper into the lore of the Wizarding World.”
Evidently, The Veil has something to do with Life and Death, as Sirius' death reveals, but no more is known about it than this. This was a missed opportunity by both the author and the filmmakers to delve deeper intothe lore of the Wizarding World. If The Veil were to be explained, it could have provided ample opportunity to explore the concept of mortality among witches and wizards,as it is well known that multiple people, including Voldermort, had tried to cheat death inHarry Potterand failed.
1Does Keller Get Found At The End Of Prisoners?
An Unsatisfying Conclusion
Prisonersis a prime example of how to do a mystery movie well.It balances the suspenseful plot of two kidnapped girls with the rage of their fathers exceptionally well, and has a great deal of red herrings to mislead audiences. After both girls have been returned safely, one of the girl’s fathers, Keller (Hugh Jackman), is imprisoned by their kidnapper in a hidden pit. When Detective Loki (Jake Gyllenhaal) goes to investigate and hears Keller’s faint whistle,Prisonerscredits start to roll.
Prisonersspends two and a half hours telling a mystery story, solving said mystery, and then ending on another mystery. This isan ending that is full of dissatisfaction, with audiences never truly being sure whether Keller was found or left to die. As this list has stated, ambiguity can be a crucial tool to use in movies, yet in this case it has been used to an extremity, detracting from the overall emotional and psychological impact of an otherwise exceptional movie.
